Re: General differences (Classical Sources Message Board)

Re: General differences
Author: Angela	June 4, 1999 at 14:16:40
in reply to: General differences* posted by KC on June 4, 1999 at 12:49:14*

Thanks, KC. I guess what is needed is a detailed review of Matin Latin, as compared to the other two.
Veritas Press' catalog recommends all of them, but has Matin Latin listed in the second grade and I'm wondering why. Perhaps another call to Mr. Martin Detweiller is in order!
I was able to look at the Primer and LC while in Pittsburgh during April, side by side. Both look good, but LC appears more friendly (to someone who knows no latin) and there isn't as much jumping around. It almost seemed easy enough for a 2nd grader, but we wish to wait until 3rd grade.
Again, thanks for your help. It would be nice if someone posted their own review on Matin Latin on the Latin review site, wouldn't it?

Angela

Follow Ups

Re: General differences Patti 23:06:29 6/6/1999 (4)
- Re: General differences KLC 14:55:45 8/24/1999 (0)
- Re: General differences KC 06:47:53 6/8/1999 (2)
  - Re: General differences Patti 14:00:41 6/8/1999 (1)
    - Re: General differences Kay 23:56:34 8/13/1999 (0)

Post Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
> Thanks, KC. I guess what is needed is a detailed review of Matin Latin, as compared to the other two. > Veritas Press' catalog recommends all of them, but has Matin Latin listed in the second grade and I'm wondering why. Perhaps another call to Mr. Martin Detweiller is in order! > I was able to look at the Primer and LC while in Pittsburgh during April, side by side. Both look good, but LC appears more friendly (to someone who knows no latin) and there isn't as much jumping around. It almost seemed easy enough for a 2nd grader, but we wish to wait until 3rd grade. > Again, thanks for your help. It would be nice if someone posted their own review on Matin Latin on the Latin review site, wouldn't it? > > Angela
Optional link URL:
Link title:
Optional image URL: